The company was fined $44,000 for a 2007 marketing campaign that involved distributing Igor cakes and merchandise in daycare centers.
So, what exactly did Saputo/Vachon/Igor do wrong?
And how did they promote these taste treat sensations?
- They designed a cartoon mascot to represent the product. Nothing new here…does anyone remember Count Chocula, Toucan Sam, the Lucky Charms leprechaun, etc…
They also created a promotional package that included:
- A Dance Igor CD
- An Igor story booklet promoting good nutrition and physical activity
- Igor stickers
- 2 Igor cakes, and
- A bunch of Igor coupons
And then they distributed these Igor promo packages to DAY CARE centers all across Quebec.
Provincially funded day care centers.
They also gave 20 day care participants a group outing of their choice worth $3000.
In their attempt to encourage physical activity and healthy eating amongst their potential customers, they created:
- a website (taken down post verdict),
- a poster highlighting Igor’s b-boy dance moves, and
- a dance video designed to help the little kiddies burn off all of that sugar from their post nap-time Igor cake binge.
And just to put the proverbial icing on the cake, the day-cares had also been told that this program would improve the children’s fitness as they would learn to do the Igor dance.
But this isn’t too surprising when you consider that “the cakes themselves, which were shaped like a gorilla and had strawberry, chocolate or vanilla filling, were billed by the company as “a delicious and nutritious snack” when combined with fruit and milk”.
So, how did this end up in the court room?
After yesterday’s decision, Ms. Pellerin was quoted as saying; “This is a victory for children, considering the impact of junk food on child health.”
Ms. Pellerin said she hopes the charges against Saputo will send a message to other companies. “Using children to sell products goes against the law,” she said. “Since we cannot act on the content of food offered to children, we can at least reduce their exposure to this advertising.”
Her group was also instrumental in prompting the charges against McDonald’s, Burger King and General Mills, expected to go to court this year.
McDonald’s is facing nine charges related to its sponsorship of a series of children’s movies broadcast on Tele-Quebec during the Christmas holidays.
General Mills faces one charge for its Lucky Charms web site, where children can play games featuring Lucky the Leprechaun.
Burger King faces 11 charges stemming from the distribution of toys with their kids’ meals.
Regarding the Burger King complaint, Ms Pellerin said that, “these collectible toys are a form of advertising that encourages children to increase their visits to Burger King restaurants and demand the meal needed to obtain these toys,” the Coalition Poids stated when its complaint was filed in December, 2007.
Okay, hold the phone for just one minute.
We’re talking about little kids here, right?
Little kids demanding junk food and toys.
This is supposed to be surprising? That kids like junk food and crappy fast food restaurant toys???
And where are their parents?
I would have assumed that it’s the parents who actually purchase the junk food.
Are we supposed to believe that these kids are stealing their parent’s SUV, driving down to Burger King and demanding their kiddie meal toys from the pimply faced drive-thru kid?
And how are those kids planning on paying for that kiddie meal?
They don’t have jobs.
You don’t think that they would resort to violence do you?
Except that, instead of a bunch of half-starved savages, Igor and the Saputo gang have created a bunch of overweight, sugar addicted 5 year olds running around holding up fast food restaurants for their kiddie meal toys.
What is this world coming to???
The next thing that you’re going to tell me is that the people who launched this lawsuit aren’t doing this out of the goodness of their hearts and the righteousness of their cause.
That they are in the business of going after bad guys who sell junk food, alcohol and cigarettes.
That they stand to get promotions and increased government funding because of their highly publicized win against Saputo/Vachon.
Now I don’t know who to cheer for.
If you like what you see here, click here for updates